Glossy Black Cockatoos drinking at Sunrise Beach |
Critical habitat for
the endangered Glossy Black Cockatoo is set to be bulldozed for a new
aged care facility at Sunrise Beach on Queensland's Sunshine Coast. A
community group set up to protect the birds, Glossy Team
Sunrise, says hundreds of food trees are threatened by a development planned by the Uniting
Church's Blue Care. The area surrounding the proposal is recognised as
a hotspot nationally for the cockatoo: during a 2016 survey in
South-East Queensland, more than a third of 96 birds recorded
were in the Noosa-Sunrise Beach area.
Glossy Team Sunrise
says five hectares of habitat will be destroyed by the development –
a huge complex including 98 residential aged care beds, 74 apartments
and 55 living units. The facility will be built in the heart of the
most important areas favoured by the Glossy Black Cockatoo. Group
spokesperson Bettina Walter says about 300 Allocasuarina feed
trees, which the birds are dependent on, would be removed. A high
care unit and car park will be built adjacent to a creek visited by
the birds for drinking. Survey stakes for the development were
planted recently.
Glossy Black Cockatoos feeding at Sunrise Beach |
Says Bettina: “From
how we read the plans and what we understand from Blue Care, it is a
clear-fell proposal… In the north [of the site] are many food trees
and this will be the site of the high care unit. In the southern area
are some real regular hotspots. These contain stands of old feeding
trees and also younger regrowth. We could spot some glossies feeding
there pretty much every time we went in. I have not found any food
trees in the adjacent southern lot, that has been allocated for
conservation.”
While Blue Care is
expected to be required to plant Allocasuarina seedlings in
nearby areas to “offset” the felled trees, these will take at
least seven years to grow. The species feeds only on the cones of
mature Allocasuarina trees. The development will also destroy
thousands of Banksia and other trees in wallum woodland on the
site.
Site of Blue Care's development plan |
According to Glossy
Team Sunrise, the then Sunshine Coast Regional Council in 2008 gave Blue Care permission to
develop the facility. It did not happen at the time and approval was
extended by the Noosa Shire Council in 2017. Says the group: “We believe the approval was
given based on dated knowledge of the ecological value of the site
and a traffic report long overtaken by reality. While aged care is
needed in Noosa, the current high-density Blue Care design will
require clear-felling of a prime habitat of the Glossy Black
Cockatoo, one of Australia’s rarest cockatoos. The Glossy Black
Conservancy recommends that where developments are planned, existing
stands of favoured food trees should be recognised and retained.”
Protecting the local
“glossies” has become a goal warmly embraced by
the local community. Residents plant food trees, remove weeds,
mark the most important feed trees and carefully monitor the
movements and behaviour of birds.
Feed tree marked at Sunrise Beach |
Adds Glossy Team
Sunrise: “At a minimum, we are asking the Uniting Church (Blue
Care) to show commitment to their aspirations to be a 'green church'
and to retain and protect our Sunrise Glossy Black Cockatoos and
wallum. We would like them to listen to a community passionate about
their unique environment and to work with Team Glossy members and
other experts to rethink and adapt the development. Their Eco-Mission
Statement is encouraging the congregation to care for the environment
as God’s creation. Well we have the perfect place to put those
words into action.”
Anyone wishing to
register their concerns about the plans can sign a petition here.
Glossy Black Cockatoo feeding at Sunrise Beach |
Thank you, Greg. Your support is much appreciated.
ReplyDeleteHi, the petition link isn’t working, could you please repost an up to date link? Thanks!
ReplyDeleteThere is so much cleared land available it is sad to take more of our bushland. If they can't afford to not go ahead with something here, how about something phased over a few years, with a small establishment first, leaving most of the habitat for the elderly residents as well as others to enjoy and appreciate (I know if I ever have to go into such a home I'd want it to be one with access to forest and birds), and starting the planting of casuarina seedlings nearby now, and the whole development staged over a decade to allow the new trees to grow and monitor whether the birds are using them before the final (not necessarily complete) clearing.
ReplyDeleteHas the petition been taken down? The link doesn't work.
ReplyDeleteThe petition link is now fixed, sorry
ReplyDeleteI endorse Ronda Green's comments -very well put.
ReplyDeleteIt is worth rationally testing whether neither the development application, the council approval, state and federal governments not calling in the development follow the rule of law under our Westminster system because in all aspects whether the development achieves the objects, principles and obligations of the Planning Act 2016, Environmental Protection Act 1994 and Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Acts and the provisions of the Economic Development Act 2012 for protection against serious environmental harm needs to be rationally tested in the context of objective facts outside subjective wishes, wants, desires likes and dislikes.
Surely the community and the Glossy Black Cockatoo are entitled to reasonable application of the Rule of Law beyond subversion through subjective rhetoric and exploitation of legislation weaknesses, exemptions and loopholes.